Current:Home > MarketsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -FundSphere
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Algosensey View
Date:2025-04-10 03:53:43
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (83255)
Related
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- 2024 Grammys Preview: Five big questions ahead of Sunday’s award show
- Britain's King Charles III discharged from hospital after prostate treatment
- Philadelphia police release video in corner store shooting that killed suspect, wounded officer
- Audit: California risked millions in homelessness funds due to poor anti-fraud protections
- Gigi Hadid Reacts to Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's PDA Moment
- Who is Victoria Monét? Meet the songwriter-turned-star nominated for seven Grammys
- The Best Planners for Staying Organized and on Top of Everything in 2024
- Audit: California risked millions in homelessness funds due to poor anti-fraud protections
- Indiana legislation would add extra verification steps to prove voters are eligible
Ranking
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- TikToker Elyse Myers Shares 4-Month-Old Son Will Undergo Heart Surgery
- Zimbabwe opposition figure gets suspended sentence after nearly 2 years in pretrial detention
- Citibank failed to protect customers from fraud, New York alleges
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Homecoming: Branford Marsalis to become artistic director at New Orleans center named for his father
- Britain's King Charles III discharged from hospital after prostate treatment
- Teachers strike in Boston suburb enters its eighth day, with tensions fraying
Recommendation
Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
'Your Utopia' considers surveillance and the perils of advanced technology
Riverdale's Lili Reinhart Shares Alopecia Diagnosis
UPS is cutting 12,000 jobs just months after reaching union deal
US Open player compensation rises to a record $65 million, with singles champs getting $3.6 million
Another Super Bowl bet emerges: Can Taylor Swift make it from her Tokyo show in time?
Dolly Parton on 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer' reboot: 'They're still working on that'
Could the 2024 presidential election affect baby name trends? Here's what to know.